ArticleScientific reports2025
Revealing synchrony in pea plants using wavelet coherence analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mind(the)Plant: An expandable multimodal facility for the integrated characterization of plant behaviour.Methods in ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we apply Wavelet Transform Coherence (WTC) analysis-a time-frequency method commonly used in human and animal synchrony research-to examine whether co-potted pea plant dyads exhibit synchronized movement during tendril approach to intertwine. This behaviour allows plants to form braided structures, providing mutual support in the absence of external scaffolds. The results reveal significant coherence, particularly pronounced at the beginning and at the end of the movement sequence. However, this effect varies across dyads, displaying a certain degree of heterogeneity in the coherence patterns. Overall, the analyses indicate that plant movements are temporally structured and non-random; nonetheless, the substantial inter-dyad variability prevents this outcome from being generalized unequivocally. We propose that such synchrony may emerge from embodied mechanisms, including mechanical feedback and chemical signalling. This work extends the application of WTC analysis to plant systems and challenges the assumption that complex coordination requires neural substrates, highlighting the role of distributed, non-neural processes in facilitating cooperative behaviour among living organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.