Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102231›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Use of floater valves to provide a constant inlet flow in furrow irrigation.

Kaveh Ostad-Ali-Askari, Hamid Raeisi-Vanani, Peiman Kianmehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaveh Ostad-Ali-AskariDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, American University in Dubai, 28282, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. kaveh.oaa2000@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-1124
Hamid Raeisi-VananiWater Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-8620
Peiman KianmehrDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, American University in Dubai, 28282, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-6027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the fact that a large number of farms are equipped with surface irrigation systems, the proper design and use of these systems increases their efficiency, which is of particular importance due to the current water crisis. In this context, it is possible to use models and tools that increase efficiency and reduce water wastage in these irrigation systems and achieve even higher efficiency than pressurized irrigation. Among the tools used in this field, we can mention floater valves. The performance of furrow irrigation is highly dependent on the inflow. One of the irrigation methods in this system is irrigation with constant inflow. To stabilize and create this state in the furrows, a flow stabilizing set is used at the head of the fields. One of these sets includes a stabilization tank with an overflow and a pump. Disadvantages of this method include excess water overflow from the tank and its wastage, as well as the need for excess energy for the pump. In this study, for solving these problems, the use of floating valves has been investigated to provide a constant inflow in furrow irrigation. For this purpose, a concrete platform was constructed on which the water storage sources were placed. A hydraulic slope was provided with a height difference of about 30 cm to transfer water from them to the flow stabilization tank. Inside the stabilization tank, two two-inch brass floating valves were used to stabilize the water level. Numerous field experiments and evaluations have shown that a height difference of 30 cm, before completely draining water from water storage sources, stabilizes the maximum inflow of 2.2 and the minimum of 1.3 L per second into the tank. Floating valves keep the water level inside the stabilization tank constant at a height of 50 cm from the outlet center of the stabilization tank with inflow of 0.8 L per second. Measurement of the inflow to the furrows by flow measuring instruments (flume) also confirmed that the intensity of the inflow to the furrows was always constant throughout the test. The main purpose of this study was to create a constant input flow in irrigation systems, especially furrow irrigation, using simple mechanical tools that can be used by all farmers. Also, reducing water loss in farms and water management in the field with the approach of reducing energy consumption is important. These goals were investigated during 60 furrow irrigation operations, and measurements showed that they could be achieved by gravity-free energy provided the minimum water head was observed and mechanical tools such as valves were used. Therefore, considering the importance of inflow in furrow irrigation, according to the results of this research, it is possible to use mechanical and piping tools, including valves, etc., in the facilities at the head of the farm to control the water entering the furrow, and one of these tools is a floater valve. In the furrow irrigation method with constant input flow rate, in order to reduce water wastage and also reduce energy costs in secondary pumping, a mechanical set that stabilizes the flow with the help of gravity energy can be used. This issue is very important due to the reduction of energy consumption and production of greenhouse gases, as well as the reduction of water wastage in the current water crisis. Therefore, the innovation presented in this current manuscript has economic, environmental, social and etc. importance.

Indexed as

Energy consumptionFloating valvesFlumeFurrow irrigationGravity-free energyHydraulic slopeInflow

Identifiers

PMID41102231
PMCPMC12532800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.