ArticleScientific data2025
Lung Ultrasound Imaging Dataset for Accurate Detection and Localization of LUS Vertical Artifact.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer vision-based support system for B-line detection in lung ultrasound.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Lung Ultrasound Imaging Dataset for Accurate Detection and Localization of LUS Vertical Artifact.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) vertical artifacts are critical sonographic markers commonly used in evaluating pulmonary conditions such as pulmonary edema, interstitial lung disease, pneumonia, and COVID-19. Accurate detection and localization of these artifacts are vital for informed clinical decision-making. However, interpreting LUS images remains highly operator-dependent, leading to variability in diagnosis. While deep learning (DL) models offer promising potential to automate LUS interpretation, their development is limited by the scarcity of annotated datasets specifically focused on vertical artifacts. This study introduces a curated dataset of 401 high-resolution LUS images, each annotated with polygonal bounding boxes to indicate vertical artifact locations. The images were collected from 152 patients with pulmonary conditions at Mulago and Kiruddu National Referral Hospitals in Uganda. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for training and evaluating DL models designed to accurately detect and localize LUS vertical artifacts, contributing to the advancement of AI-driven diagnostic tools for early detection and monitoring of respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.