ArticleNature communications2025
Genetic determinants and genomic consequences of non-leukemogenic somatic point mutations.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic influences on haematopoiesis.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Patterns and drivers of 43,617 mosaic chromosomal alterations in blood.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Clonal haematopoiesis and cardiovascular disease, defining risk, filling gaps, and framing the future.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Review
- Unraveling immunity: insights from biobank-scale data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
55 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is defined by the expansion of a lineage of genetically identical cells in blood. Genetic lesions that confer a fitness advantage, such as leukemogenic point mutations or mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), are frequent mediators of CH. However, recent analyses of both single cell-derived colonies of hematopoietic cells and population sequencing cohorts have revealed CH frequently occurs in the absence of known driver genetic lesions. To characterize CH without known driver genetic lesions, we use 51,399 deeply sequenced whole genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed sequencing initiative to perform simultaneous germline and somatic mutation analyses among individuals without leukemogenic point mutations (LPM), which we term CH-LPMneg. We quantify CH by estimating the total mutation burden. Because estimating somatic mutation burden without a paired-tissue sample is challenging, we develop a novel statistical method, the Genomic and Epigenomic informed Mutation (GEM) rate, that uses external genomic and epigenomic data sources to distinguish artifactual signals from true somatic mutations. We perform a genome-wide association study of GEM to discover the germline determinants of CH-LPMneg. We identify seven genes associated with CH-LPMneg (TCL1A, TERT, SMC4, NRIP1, PRDM16, MSRA, SCARB1).Functional analyses of SMC4 and NRIP1 implicated altered hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and proliferation as the primary mediator of mutation burden in blood. We then perform comprehensive multi-tissue transcriptomic analyses, finding that the expression levels of 404 genes are associated with GEM. Finally, we perform phenotypic association meta-analyses across four cohorts, finding that GEM is associated with increased white blood cell count, but is not significantly associated with incident stroke or coronary disease events. Overall, we develop GEM for quantifying mutation burden from WGS and use GEM to discover the genetic, genomic, and phenotypic correlates of CH-LPMneg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.