ArticleNature communications2025
Predicting sequence-specific amplification efficiency in multi-template PCR with deep learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of state-of-the-art error-correction coding for sequence-based DNA data storage.Nature communications · 2026Article
- PCR bias impacts microbiome ecological analyses.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Predicting sequence-specific amplification efficiency in multi-template PCR with deep learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Aptamers in Drug Delivery Development.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2025Article
- PCR Bias Impacts Microbiome Ecological Analyses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-template polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a critical technique enabling the parallel amplification of diverse DNA molecules, thereby facilitating applications in fields from quantitative molecular biology to DNA data storage. However, non-homogeneous amplification due to sequence-specific amplification efficiencies often results in skewed abundance data, compromising accuracy and sensitivity. In this study, we address amplification efficiency in complex amplicon libraries by employing one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) to predict sequence-specific amplification efficiencies, based on sequence information alone. Trained on reliably annotated datasets derived from synthetic DNA pools, these models achieve a high predictive performance (AUROC: 0.88, AUPRC: 0.44), thereby enabling the design of inherently homogeneous amplicon libraries. We further introduce CluMo, a deep learning interpretation framework that identifies specific motifs adjacent to adapter priming sites as closely associated with poor amplification. This insight leads to the elucidation of adapter-mediated self-priming as the major mechanism causing low amplification efficiency, challenging long-standing PCR design assumptions. By addressing the basis for non-homogeneous amplification in multi-template PCR, our deep-learning approach reduces the required sequencing depth to recover 99% of amplicon sequences fourfold, and opens new avenues to improve the efficiency of DNA amplification in fields such as genomics, diagnostics, and synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.