ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2026
Enhancing Newborn Health Assessment: Ultrasound-based Body Composition Prediction Using Deep Learning Techniques.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A machine learning approach to using ultrasound for body composition and nutritional status assessment in newborns: a pilot study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigates the feasibility of deep learning to predict body composition with ultrasound, specifically fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), to improve newborn health assessments.
methodsWe analyzed 721 ultrasound images of the biceps, quadriceps and abdomen from 65 pre-term infants. A deep learning model incorporating a modified U-Net architecture was developed to predict FM and FFM using air displacement plethysmography as ground truth labels for training. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), along with Bland-Altman plots to evaluate mean bias and limits of agreement. We tested different image combinations to determine the contribution of anatomical regions. Grad-CAM was applied to identify image regions with the strongest influence on predictions.
resultsCombining biceps, quadriceps and abdominal ultrasound images to predict whole-body composition showed strong agreement with ground truth values, with low MAE (FM: 0.0145 kg, FFM: 0.0794 kg), MSE (FM: 0.0003 kg
conclusionDeep learning provides a promising approach to predicting body composition with ultrasound and could be a valuable tool for assessing nutritional status in neonatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.