ArticleBMJ open2025
Factors influencing optimal postoperative pain management: a scoping literature review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors influencing optimal postoperative pain management: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective postoperative pain management is a critical component of surgical care, directly influencing patient recovery, satisfaction and long-term outcomes. Despite recent advances in pain management, postoperative pain remains poorly managed worldwide, suggesting that postoperative pain outcomes are influenced by factors beyond the inherent efficacy of available treatments. This scoping review aims to map the factors influencing postoperative pain management and recommendations that support optimal, evidence-based pain management after surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for evidence synthesis and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping review guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature and PsycINFO will be searched for the relevant literature from the journals' inception to September 2025. Two reviewers will independently conduct the screening of titles and abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction. Data will be mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model. Where additional data requires coding, thematic analysis will be conducted using NVivo data management software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will analyse publicly available data. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. The findings will serve as a foundation for engaging relevant stakeholders in discussions aimed at implementing systemic changes to support healthcare providers in enhancing postoperative pain management. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal publication, local fora and conference presentations to ensure broad visibility and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.