ArticleBMJ open2025
Effects of global health initiatives on the quality of care for maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review report.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlobal health initiatives (GHIs) have played a significant role in expanding access to healthcare worldwide, particularly in maternal health. For instance, many regions in sub-Saharan Africa have seen a notable rise in the availability of skilled birth attendants. However, despite these gains in access, maternal mortality rates in low-income and middle-income countries within the African Region remain alarmingly high. Although GHIs have invested heavily in maternal health, there is limited evidence regarding their effects on the quality of maternal healthcare, an essential factor influencing maternal outcomes. The WHO has developed quality standards for maternal and newborn care to guide all stakeholders in delivery of care for mothers. These include evidence-based practices for managing childbirth complications, efficient health information systems, appropriate referral mechanisms, respectful and dignified treatment of patients, emotional support, well-trained and motivated healthcare providers and a conducive physical environment. These standards serve as a framework for improving and assessing the quality of maternal and newborn services. Despite significant funding and technical guidance aimed at enhancing care quality, there remains a lack of robust data on how GHIs have influenced the quality of maternal health services. To address this evidence gap, we conducted a scoping review to gather and analyse existing evidence on the effects of GHIs on maternal care quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. This report presents the findings from that review.
methodsThis study followed the enhanced six-stage framework for scoping reviews developed by Arksey and O'Malley. We included both peer-reviewed and grey literature such as reports and policy documents that addressed the impact of GHIs on maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa between 2010 and 2024. Sources in all languages were considered. A defined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria guided the screening process. The selected studies underwent qualitative synthesis and descriptive analysis and were visually represented where appropriate. This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. KEY
findingsThe search yielded only five quantitative studies, depicting the limited evidence on this critical subject. The studies showed that GHIs had varied effects on quality of care for mothers. These effects included improved readiness of facilities to provide care, improved prenatal-postnatal processes, increased provider knowledge, active management of labour and a decrease in mortality rates in some instances such as Uganda and Zambia. However, there was limited or no improvement in clinical practices, patient experiences and satisfaction with care. Additionally, the studies did not focus on the multidimensional aspects of quality of care as guided by WHO's comprehensive standards for quality of maternal health services, highlighting a major gap identified throughout this review.
conclusionsWhile the limited studies available showed some improvements in specific care quality indicators, there remain significant gaps in the knowledge around how GHIs affect care quality comprehensively. Additionally, the identified studies highlighted significant challenges as a key gap to achieving the intended outcomes and sustaining the gains made during programme implementation. To have a more in-depth understanding of GHIs and their impact on quality of care, it is important to align programme implementation and assessments with comprehensive frameworks such as WHO's multidimensional quality model. Further, there is a need to adopt iterative, context-sensitive interventions that provide a comprehensive approach to quality of care. The information gathered will be used to inform subsequent studies on the effects of GHIs on quality of care of maternal health services in Uganda and contribute to the development of maternal healthcare policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.