ArticleBMJ global health2025
Empowering African professionals to assess palliative care development: regional application of the WHO framework.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe WHO has proposed a structured framework to assess palliative care development through 14 actionable indicators across 6 dimensions. While prior applications have been limited to individual countries, this study explores the feasibility of empowering professionals across an entire region to independently evaluate palliative care development using the WHO framework.
methodsAn expert-informed, participatory implementation study was conducted across the African continent. A structured survey based on the WHO indicators was developed and translated into multiple languages. A regional network of national consultants was established, and participants were trained through an asynchronous, tutored online course. Data collection involved self-assessment of national palliative care development, accompanied by narrative justifications and documentary evidence. Validation processes included peer review and, where feasible, endorsement by national associations or authorities. Empowerment was assessed through course completion, perceived impact via post-course surveys and participation in data validation.
resultsNational-level data from 50 African countries were included, based on 121 contributors. Most countries had at least two contributors, ensuring data triangulation. Validation processes were completed in 48 countries, with 21 reports endorsed by national associations or authorities. Post-course surveys indicated that 91% of respondents rated the course highly for professional value, and 95% expressed interest in ongoing collaboration. The data collected are already informing global comparative analyses, including the African Palliative Care Atlas (2025 edition).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that with appropriate training and support, professionals across an entire region can independently assess palliative care development using the WHO framework. The approach fosters professional empowerment and provides high-quality, context-rich data, laying the groundwork for similar initiatives in other regions and contributing to a coordinated global assessment of palliative care development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.