ArticleEnvironmental entomology2025
Pacific Northwest native plants and native cultivars part II: plant and pollinator traits.
Article in Environmental entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of native plant cultivars in pollinator plantings is somewhat controversial. Although some cultivars originate from wild populations, others are bred for novel ornamental traits, which may have unintended impacts on floral rewards, such as nectar and pollen. It is unclear whether changes in floral displays and/or rewards may alter plant-pollinator relationships. We established an experimental garden of Pacific Northwest native plants and native cultivars to evaluate differences in their floral traits and bee communities. We used a combination of methodologies to quantify variation in plant traits that could influence pollinator foraging, including those associated with floral displays (eg petal color, corolla morphology) and floral rewards (pollen and nectar). We also measured changes in bee community composition (eg species associations, functional diversity) across plant groups. We found that cultivars varied significantly from native plants across multiple floral display or reward traits. No plants were bred for nectar or pollen traits, thus changes in rewards were likely pleiotropic. Nine out of 10 tested cultivars had dissimilar bee communities to their native plant counterpart, though minimally developed cultivars were associated with similar bee species and functional traits. Our results suggest that the development of native plant cultivars can come at the cost of pollinator functional richness, though some variation in bee composition may be expected among wild plant populations with diverse phenotypes. Plants with phenotypes consistent with wild-type plants tended to support functionally rich bee communities and should be emphasized in plantings to maximize potential benefits to pollinators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.