ArticleBone & joint open2025
Total hip arthroplasty for acute acetabular fractures through the replace-in-situ philosophy : radiological assessment of component stability.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the early stability of acetabular components of total hip arthroplasty (THA) treating acute acetabular fractures through a replace-in-situ technique, using standard radiological assessment techniques as well as radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the gold standard for assessment of implant stability. Methods: We prospectively investigated 29 patients who underwent THA to manage an acute acetabular fracture in which patients underwent postoperative in-clinic radiological assessment of acetabular component stability, and detailed measurements using both RSA and manual techniques. The latter were performed based on pelvic reference landmarks located below and above the fracture. Greater than 3 mm of proximal translation and/or 5° of rotation around the sagittal axis were considered diagnostic of a loose acetabular component. Results: The median proximal translation and sagittal rotation of the cohort was 0.5 mm (IQR 0.3 to 0.9) and 0.8° (IQR -0.6° to 1.1°), respectively, as measured by RSA at two years. Acetabular components in the most unstable acetabular fracture patterns were found to migrate more immediately post-surgery. There was a disparity between different measurement techniques. Accurate RSA measurements correctly identified two components that were deemed to be clinically loose, and the diagnostic performance of RSA migration measurements was improved when migration within the first six months was excluded. Visual assessment of radiographs in clinic underestimated - and manual radiological measurements overestimated - acetabular component loosening in these complex cases. Conclusion: The replace-in-situ technique led to acceptable early acetabular component stability in the majority of cases (27/29, 93%), a good result considering the complexity of these reconstructions. Accurate measurements of acetabular component migration are recommended in these cases, as pelvic landmark identification on consecutive plain radiographs is influenced by both pelvic projection on plain radiographs and fracture fragment migration during healing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.