Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100712›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Release from Speech-on-Speech Masking: Additivity of Segregation Cues and Build-Up of Segregation.

Maike Klingel, Bernhard Laback

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maike KlingelAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-6787
Bernhard LabackAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-6787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several segregation cues help listeners understand speech in the presence of distractor talkers, most notably differences in talker sex (i.e., differences in fundamental frequency and vocal tract length) and spatial location. It is unclear, however, how these cues work together, namely whether they show additive or even synergistic effects. Furthermore, previous research suggests better performance for target words that occur later in a sentence or sequence. We additionally investigate for which segregation cues or cue combinations this build-up occurs and whether it depends on memory effects. Twenty normal-hearing participants completed a speech-on-speech masking experiment using the OLSA (a German matrix test) speech material. We adaptively measured speech-reception thresholds for different segregation cues (differences in spatial location, fundamental frequency, and talker sex) and response conditions (which word(s) need(s) to be reported). The results show better thresholds for single-word reports, reflecting memory constraints for multiple-word reports. We also found additivity of segregation cues for multiple- but sub-additivity for single-word reports. Finally, we observed a build-up of release from speech-on-speech masking that depended on response and cue conditions, namely no build-up for multiple-word reports and continuous build-up except for the easiest condition, i.e., different sex/spatially separated maskers for single-word reports. These results shed further light on how listeners follow a target talker in the presence of competing talkers, i.e., the classical cocktail-party problem, and indicate the potential for performance improvement from enhancing segregation cues in the hearing-impaired.

Indexed as

CuesNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech AcousticsSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleSpeech Reception Threshold TestYoung Adultcocktail party problemspeech intelligibilitystream segregation

Identifiers

PMID41100712
PMCPMC12536088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.