ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Retrospective Analysis of CT-based Habitat Analysis for Predicting pCR and Survival of ESCC Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity Analyzed by CT-Based Habitat Analysis for Clinical Management of Cancers: A Narrative Review.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThis study sought to develop a predictive model using CT-based habitat radiomics to forecast pathological complete response (pCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by curative surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed baseline CT imaging data from 228 ESCC patients in a prospective cohort database. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3 ratio). Whole-tumor and habitat-derived radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CT scans. For pCR prediction, habitat signatures were developed using Logistic Regression (LR), RandomForest (RF), and XGBoost models, optimized via grid search. PFS prediction employed Cox proportional hazards modeling with selected features. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.ResultsThe habitat models retained 10 features for pCR prediction and 12 for PFS prediction. For pCR, the habitat-derived RF model demonstrated superior performance (training AUC: 0.821; validation AUC: 0.826), outperforming both other habitat models and the whole-tumor radiomics model (training AUC: 0.645). Similarly, the habitat-based RF model for PFS achieved higher AUCs (training: 0.759, 95% CI: 0.627-0.889; validation: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.653-0.966) compared to whole-tumor radiomics (training: 0.623; validation: 0.519).ConclusionOur analyses indicated a trend where habitat radiomics
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.