ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Comparison of venous lactate values on blood gas analyser versus laboratory autoanalyser: A preliminary study.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives Lactate can be estimated by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices such as blood gas analysers (BGA) as well as central lab autoanalysers (AA); both have their advantages. Studies have compared lactate and electrolyte values on arterial blood; none used venous samples which are preferred in children. We planned to compare venous lactate by BGA and AA in children admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods Fifty children aged one month to 18 yr admitted in PICU were included in the study after parental consent. Paired venous samples were collected in heparinised syringes for BGA, in fluoride containing vacutainers for AA and were analysed immediately. Results Lactate levels were assessed in 29 male and 21 female children [Median age: 4 yr interquartile range (IQR)=1-10)]. AA reported higher lactate levels but mean difference between two methods (0.34±1.56 mmol/L) was not statistically significant (P= 0.062). The methods showed statistically significant correlation [95% confidence interval (CI), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs)=0.816, P=<0.001]. Bland Altman plot showed 95 per cent of paired values had differences which was within limits of agreement (-2.71, +3.39); differences were more variable above 2 mmol/L. Both devices classified multiple samples into different clinically significant ranges. Interpretation & conclusion Venous lactate by BGA and AA was found comparable, but critical values requiring clinical intervention were not reported similarly by both analysers. Variability between them was higher at higher venous lactate levels (>2 mmol/L) which represent critically ill children. Use of the same analyser, either BGA or AA, is therefore recommended for monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.