Observational studyThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Keratinophilic fungal infections in dermatology outpatients from a tertiary care hospital in Southern Rajasthan.
Observational study in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological considerations in keratinophilic fungal infections study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Authors' Response.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives A marked increase in resistance and frequency of occurrence has led to changes in the clinical and epidemiological patterns of dermatophytosis. This study was conducted to assess the current distribution pattern of various species of dermatophytes, their seasonal variation, and distribution based on lesion site and occupational status in outpatients attending a tertiary care hospital in Southern Rajasthan. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted over one year using skin, hair, and nail samples from individuals clinically suspected of dermatophytosis. All samples underwent screening with potassium hydroxide (KOH), followed by culture and processing using standard protocols for dermatophyte identification. Results Of the 70 samples received, 65 (92.3%) tested positive for dermatophytes. Tinea corporis was the most common clinical presentation, observed in 64.6 per cent of cases. Among the positive isolates, 95.4 per cent belonged to the Trichophyton genus, with Trichophyton rubrum being the predominant species (46.2%). A higher incidence of infection was noted in individuals from low-income groups (60%). Sharing of fomites (objects such as towels, clothing, or bedding that can carry infection) emerged as the most significant individual risk factor for dermatophytosis, followed by bathing frequency of less than three times per week. Interpretation & conclusions Accurate clinical diagnosis should be complemented by effective laboratory methods to ensure rapid and precise identification of dermatophytes, facilitating early diagnosis and timely treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.