ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experiences of Perfusionists on the Safety of Cardiopulmonary Perfusion.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerfusion accidents still threaten the safety of perfusion during open-heart surgery. To prevent these accidents and increase perfusion safety, it is important to first determine the profile of perfusionists. The aims of this study were to determine the current status of perfusion safety during open-heart surgeries in Turkiye and to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of perfusionists about cardiopulmonary perfusion safety.
methodsFirst, 148 perfusionists answered the Perfusionists' Attitudes on Perfusion Safety survey, and second, 109 perfusionists answered the Perfusion Safety and Accidents survey. In the first survey, perfusionists' attitudes and opinions help us understand the profile of Turkish perfusionists. In the second survey, we tried to obtain experiences and data about perfusion accidents, experienced by the participant perfusionists, to make a detailed analysis.
resultsTurkish perfusionists are willing to ensure perfusion safety and prevent accidents. In this study, however, we found that educational institutions and clinics have not transmitted enough knowledge to perfusionists related to perfusion safety issues. There is some lack in the perfusionists knowledge about perfusion safety and preventing or reducing perfusion accidents.
conclusionPerfusionists need more training to ensure perfusion safety and to prevent perfusion accidents. It would be very beneficial to include a course on perfusion safety in academic settings that focuses on this subject in the curricula. Further comprehensive studies on this subject will make very important contributions to the practical perfusion applications in increasing perfusion safety and reducing perfusion accidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.