ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2025
Beating Tricuspid Surgery is a Viable Option with Similar Outcomes to Traditional Surgery: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe advantages of beating heart tricuspid surgery without aortic cross-clamping remain underexplored, particularly in the context of concomitant procedures. This study aimed to compare the shortand long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery performed with and without aortic cross-clamping.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,154 patients who underwent isolated or concomitant tricuspid valve surgery between 2009 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent surgery without aortic cross-clamping (beating heart, n = 170) and those with cross-clamping (arrested heart, n = 984). Propensity score matching identified 139 matched pairs.
resultsThe mean age was 56 years (25th-75th percentiles: 47, 65), with 61.27% female patients and 95% undergoing concomitant procedures. In the unmatched cohort, patients who underwent beating heart surgery had higher preoperative creatinine clearance (93.53 vs. 81.33 ml/min, P = 0.036) and shorter intensive care unit stays (3 [1 - 5] vs. 3 [1 - 6] days, P = 0.037). However, after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in postoperative heart block (P > 0.99), creatinine levels (P = 0.780), or tricuspid regurgitation grade (P = 0.082) between the two groups. Long-term outcomes, including 10-year freedom from reintervention (95% vs. 98%, log-rank P = 0.087), survival (77% vs. 82%, P = 0.964), and heart failure rehospitalization (76% vs. 77%, P = 0.444), were also comparable between the matched cohorts.
conclusionConcomitant tricuspid surgery without aortic cross-clamping is a viable alternative to traditional arrested heart surgery, with no significant differences in shortor long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.