Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100571›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries.

Daniel Gygax, Sabina Ramirez, Moses Chibesa, Twakundine Simpamba, Michael Riffel, Tom Riffel, Amrita Srivathsan, Reindert Nijland, Lara Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel GygaxFaunomics, Rifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2362-0063
Sabina RamirezFaunomics, Rifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8795-7061
Moses ChibesaDepartment of Zoology and Aquatic Sciences, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-9991
Twakundine SimpambaDepartment of National Parks and Wildlife, Chilanga, Zambia.
Michael RiffelFaunomics, Rifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.
Tom RiffelNsanga Conservation, Mfuwe, Zambia.
Amrita SrivathsanCenter for Integrative Biodiversity Discovery, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany.
Reindert NijlandMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-3768
Lara UrbanTechnical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Freising, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-9314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a global challenge of the 21st century. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based metabarcoding offers a cost- and time-efficient alternative to conventional biodiversity surveys, enabling detection of rare, cryptic, and elusive species from environmental samples. However, limited access to genomic technologies restricts the application of eDNA metabarcoding in highly biodiverse remote regions and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here, we directly compared the latest portable nanopore sequencing methods with established Illumina sequencing for vertebrate eDNA metabarcoding of Zambian water samples. Our results show that due to recent improvements in sequencing chemistry and optimized basecalling, nanopore sequencing data can recapitulate or even surpass established protocols, demonstrating the feasibility of in situ biodiversity assessments. eDNA- and camera trap-based species detections had minimal overlap in species detections, suggesting a complementary rather than substituting application of these biodiversity monitoring technologies. We finally demonstrate that our entire eDNA workflow can be successfully implemented in a mobile laboratory under remote field conditions by completing all steps-from sample collection to data analysis-within the Luambe National Park in Zambia. This approach has important implications for capacity building in LMICs and for overcoming limitations associated with sample export.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalNanopore SequencingAnimalsBiodiversityEnvironmental MonitoringHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingZambiaDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID41100571
PMCPMC12530551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.