ArticlePloS one2025
Investment attractiveness in BRICS+ economies: Evaluating business environment reforms, institutional quality, and macroeconomic factors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investment is a key driver of economic growth in emerging markets, yet the factors that enable or hinder foreign direct investment (FDI) and domestic investment (DI) remain contested. Regulatory reforms aimed at improving the ease of doing business (EDB) have been widely promoted as a means to attract capital, but empirical evidence on their effectiveness, especially in diverse and institutionally heterogeneous economies, is mixed. This study examines how EDB affects investment flows in nine BRICS+ economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates) over 2004-2020. Three objectives guide the analysis: assessing the direct EDB-investment link, testing the mediating role of institutional quality, specifically, regulatory quality, government effectiveness, and control of corruption, and analyzing moderation by financial development, economic freedom, and macroeconomic stability. A Pooled Mean Group, Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) approach is employed for the panel estimations, complemented by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to quantify mediation effects. The results reveal a dual effect of EDB, as it stimulates DI but exerts a modest negative long-term impact on FDI, likely due to transitional adjustment costs and the withdrawal of targeted investment incentives. Mediation analysis shows that institutional quality strongly channels the benefits of EDB to both FDI and DI, with indirect effects often exceeding direct ones. Financial development strengthens the positive EDB-investment relationship, while economic freedom and inflation partially dampen it. Country-specific results indicate substantial heterogeneity in the EDB-investment nexus, with some economies experiencing counterintuitive or insignificant effects. Policy implications differ by investment type. For FDI, reforms should be sequenced gradually, supported by transitional incentives, and aligned with targeted institutional strengthening to offset short-term deterrents. For DI, priority should be given to reducing operational costs, expanding access to finance, and maintaining macroeconomic stability, which collectively enhance domestic firms' capacity to invest and grow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.