Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A study protocol of the rehabilitative efficacy of cardiovascular ultrasound therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease: A multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled study.

Chunwei He, Jie Peng, Hong Liu, Lin Zhong, Yanjin Wei, Hao Qiu, Chuanliang Liu, Nana Lv, Lixia Liu, Xuewen Qi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06640400 (A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Cardiovascular Ultrasound Therapy on the Rehabilitation of Patients After PCI for Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06640400 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

A Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Cardiovascular Ultrasound Therapy on the Rehabilitation of Patients After PCI for Coronary Artery Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsCardiovascular ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chunwei HeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine & Laboratory of Gerontology and Anti-Aging Research, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jie PengDepartment of Geriatric Medicine & Laboratory of Gerontology and Anti-Aging Research, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hong LiuQingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Lin ZhongYantai Yuhuanding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Yanjin WeiLinyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Hao QiuTengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, Shandong, China.
Chuanliang LiuWeifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Nana LvJining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.
Lixia LiuWeihai Central Hospital, Weihai, Shandong, China.
Xuewen QiLiaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, Shandong, China.
Fenglei ZhangDongying People's Hospital, Dongying, Shandong, China.
Beian YouQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qilong SongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2372-7968
Lin ShenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine & Laboratory of Gerontology and Anti-Aging Research, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4766-1648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality and disability, placing heavy burdens on healthcare systems. Although cardiovascular ultrasound therapy has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in improving refractory angina, relevant clinical studies are rare and clinical evidence is lacking. METHODS AND

designThis is a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 200 patients with coronary artery disease who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and randomized them into two groups. The intervention group will be given usual-practice plus cardiovascular ultrasound therapy intervention and the control group will be given only usual-practice intervention. After 20 treatments with cardiovascular ultrasound therapy, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in serum will be used as the primary outcome measures. The following will be used in determining secondary outcomes: indicators of serum myocardial injury, blood lipid levels, markers of endothelial function, inflammatory factors, hemodynamic indicators, echocardiography, ultrasound examination for carotid plaques, 6-minute walk test, short-term variability in heart rate, and mental health assessment. The researchers plan to test the outcome indicators at multiple time points. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS version 26 statistical software (IBM, Armonk, NY). DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical study of the rehabilitative efficacy of cardiovascular ultrasound therapy in the treatment of CAD after PCI. Clinical recovery currently depends mainly on modalities such as medication, exercise, and nutritional therapy; therefore, cardiovascular ultrasound therapy, as a new mode of therapy, might become a major advance in the treatment of CAD after PCI.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06640400.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionUltrasonic TherapyAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID41100539
PMCPMC12530608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.