ArticlePloS one2025
A contrastive adversarial encoder for multi-omics data integration.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MOCDT: multi-cancer detection and tissue-of-origin classification via cfDNA multi-modal integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate cancer detection is crucial for effective treatment, prognosis, and the advancement of precision medicine. Analyzing omics data is vital in cancer research. While using a single type of omics data provides a limited perspective, integrating multiple omics modalities allows for a more comprehensive understanding of cancer. Current deep models struggle to achieve efficient dimensionality reduction while preserving global information and integrating multi-omics data. This often results in feature redundancy or information loss, overlooking the synergies among different modalities. This paper proposes a contrastive adversarial encoder (CAEncoder) for multi-omics data integration to address this challenge. The proposed model combines a Vision Transformer (ViT) and a CycleGAN, trained in an end-to-end contrastive manner. The ViT is the encoder, utilizing self-attention, while the CycleGAN employs adversarial learning to ensure more discriminative and invariant latent space embeddings. Contrastive adversarial training improves representation quality by preventing information loss, eliminating redundancy, and capturing the synergies among different omics modalities. To ensure contrastive adversarial training, a composite loss function is used, consisting of a weighted combination of Adversarial Loss (Hinge Loss), Cycle Consistency Loss, and Triplet Margin Loss. The Adversarial Loss and Cycle Consistency Loss provide feedback from the CycleGAN, ensuring effective adversarial learning. Meanwhile, the Triplet Margin Loss promotes contrastive learning by pulling similar samples together and pushing dissimilar samples apart in the latent space. The performance of the CAEncoder is evaluated on downstream classification tasks, including both binary and multi-class classifications of five different cancer types. The results show that the model achieved a classification accuracy of up to 93.33% and an F1 score of 92.81%, outperforming existing advanced models. These findings demonstrate the potential of our method to enhance precision medicine for cancer through improved multi-omics data integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.