ArticlePloS one2025
Co-designing accessible and inclusive patient information resources for gastrointestinal endoscopy using Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How We Embedded Consumer Engagement Into Workplace Education and Continuing Professional Development: A Quality Improvement Initiative in a Tertiary Imaging Department.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients undergoing GI endoscopy can experience anxiety before their procedure, for numerous different reasons, including ineffective patient education resources received beforehand. Paper-based information leaflets are insufficient to accommodate for the diverse way in which people access, consume and process information. Public and patient involvement (PPI) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) are two well-described pedagogical principles that strive to optimise patient-centred care and inclusivity.
objectivesOur aim was to apply these principles to design more effective and accessible patient education materials, improving the health literacy of our patients. Working with patient partners, we identified the need to develop high-quality and trustable video resources for patients, that would be available on our hospital website. These videos were co-designed by patients and other key stakeholders.
resultsWe used techniques such as storyboard development, the UDL educational principles of representation, engagement and expression, as well as the individual expertise of our stakeholder panel members to achieve appropriate and accessible information for our patient cohort. The development phase was an iterative process, with feedback and input from patient partners and other stakeholders playing a crucial role in prompting necessary adjustments for accuracy and patient understanding. Our project is the first guide in combining both PPI and UDL principles in the development of patient information and education materials.
conclusionBy involving patients and other key stakeholders as partners, we improved the relevance and quality of our patient information content. Identification of patient partners and appropriate other stakeholders is an important initial step when co-designing patient information resources. The use of UDL in the co-design process allows for a structured approach to creating accessible content, highlighting important steps that otherwise may be overlooked by team members. Formal assessment of the impact of these co-designed videos, through quantitative and qualitative methods, will be assessed as part of a larger study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.