Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Lizard polymorphic throat colors are distinguishable by conspecifics and predators across variable light environments.

Graham T BeVier, Kinsey M Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham T BeVierDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.
Kinsey M BrockDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6093-9413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color polymorphisms, or distinct color variants within a population, provide tractable study systems for studying the generation, maintenance, and loss of phenotypic diversity in nature because biologists can easily observe changes in the number and frequency of discrete variants over time. However, many color polymorphisms are studied in the context of the human visual system and do not consider how conspecifics or potential predators view morph variation. The visual systems of predators and conspecifics may be sensitive to different aspects of coloration, which can influence the evolution and maintenance of morph diversity and phenotypic variation within and between populations. The Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii) is a color polymorphic lizard that exhibits co-occurring orange, white, and yellow throat color morphs. Here, we measured the reflectance of P. erhardii throat color patches and used visual modelling to determine if lizards and their bird and snake predators can visually discriminate between morph colors across different lighting contexts. Our results suggest that P. erhardii and their violet-sensitive bird and snake predators can distinguish chromatically between each color morph pair in standard daylight and forest shade illuminance contexts. However, only P. erhardii can distinguish achromatic morph colors in both illuminance contexts (except for white and yellow morphs in forest shade). These results indicate that P. erhardii morphs are most difficult for predators to distinguish in low lighting conditions and could help explain previously observed morph differences in microhabitat usage.

Indexed as

LightLizardsPigmentationPredatory BehaviorAnimalsBirdsColorSnakes

Identifiers

PMID41100503
PMCPMC12530538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.