ArticlePloS one2025
Development and validation of the arabic version of the social-ecological model questionnaire for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in Arabic-speaking regions, particularly in Palestine, face unique sociopolitical and cultural barriers affecting their care and quality of life. Existing assessment tools rarely address the multi-level determinants of support within these populations, highlighting the need for a culturally validated instrument based on the Social-Ecological Model (SEM).
objectiveTo develop and validate an Arabic-language questionnaire grounded in the SEM to assess the multi-level (community, interpersonal, organizational, and policy) support factors influencing MHD patients in the Gaza Strip.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2024 to February 2025 at three governmental dialysis centers in Gaza, enrolling 101 Arabic-speaking adult MHD patients through systematic random sampling. The validation process encompassed item analysis, content and face validity, and psychometric testing, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), assessment of convergent and discriminant validity which includes average variance extracted, factor loadings, composite reliability, Cronbach's alpha, Fornell-Larcker criterion, cross-loadings, and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio.
resultsThe EFA identified a four-factor structure corresponding to Community, Interpersonal, Organizational, and Policy Support, explaining 65.15% of the variance. The final validated questionnaire comprised 31 items, with the Community Support domain demonstrating the strongest psychometric properties (factor loadings: 0.821-0.923; Cronbach's alpha = 0.972; AVE = 0.796). While Interpersonal and Organizational domains showed acceptable reliability and validity, the Policy Support domain displayed marginal construct validity. Overall, the instrument had strong content, face, convergent, and discriminant validity.
conclusionThe Arabic SEM-based questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing multi-level support factors among MHD patients in Arabic-speaking contexts. It enables comprehensive evaluation for research and clinical practice. Future research should confirm its structure using confirmatory factor analysis, extend validation to diverse Arab populations, and examine temporal stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.