Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Studying on the efficiency of higher education resource allocation and its influencing factors in the western China using DEA-Malmquist and Tobit models.

Ziyu Ye, Ribesh Khanal, Zhiqiang Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziyu YeSchool of Education Science, Guangxi Normal University for Nationalities, Chongzuo, Guangxi, China.
Ribesh KhanalCollege of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-8007
Zhiqiang CaoSchool of Economics and management, Guangxi Normal University for Nationalities, Chongzuo, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3797-3776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing higher education resource allocation in western China is vital for advancing national development through education and talent. This research covers the DEA Malmquist to examine the effectiveness of higher education materials distributed statically and vigorously within twelve provinces in the western part of China. It also studies the internal inequalities in resource distribution effectiveness and employs the Tobit model to identify which the main factors affecting the efficiency of higher education resource allocation. The primarily data sources from the China Education Yearbook (2011-2021). The findings indicate that the comprehensive technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE), and scale efficiency (SE) have not reached the efficiency frontier in higher education resource allocation in western China. Conversely, the dynamic analysis reveals a decline in overall efficiency in resource allocation for higher education in the western region, with significant variations in efficiency levels among the provinces. Factors such as education expenditure, GDP per capita, total GDP, and the breadth of education significantly impact the efficiency of resource allocation for higher education in the western region. To improve this efficiency, it is essential to boost financial input into education, adjust resource allocation strategies, focus on matching educational quality with market demands, and implement dynamic monitoring and evaluation.

Indexed as

EducationResource AllocationChinaHumans

Identifiers

PMID41100476
PMCPMC12530591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.