Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100179›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2025

Bacterial community responses to micropollutants in chemically stressed small rivers in Kenya using environmental DNA.

Nicolai Verbücheln, Sonja Schaufelberger, Tibaud Cardis, Isaac C Tanui, Faith Kandie, Werner Brack, Thomas Backhaus, Pedro A Inostroza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolai VerbüchelnDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 41390 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0003-7017-9413
Sonja SchaufelbergerDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 41390 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tibaud CardisDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 41390 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Isaac C TanuiDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Faith KandieDepartment of Biological Sciences, Moi University, 3900-30100 Eldoret, Kenya.
Werner BrackDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas BackhausDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 41390 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pedro A InostrozaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 41390 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-8308

Funding

Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing 2022/22-169Swedish Research Council 2022-06725University of GothenburgUPPMAX 2023/22-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The responses of bacterial communities to changing environmental conditions are manifold but can include structural as well as functional alterations depending on the environmental stressors and toxic chemicals they are exposed to (e.g. pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). In this study, environmental DNA was extracted from surface water samples collected from four small rivers in the Lake Victoria South Basin (Western Kenya) to (i) evaluate whether alpha- and beta-diversity change in dependency of land-use types, (ii) identify the environmental variables that explain alterations in community structure, (iii) qualitatively and quantitatively assess the consequences of antimicrobial stress on bacterial communities, and (iv) evaluate bacterial functional changes related to the degradation of organic chemicals. Our findings suggest that bacterial community composition is a more sensitive indicator to reflect the impact of chemical pollution derived from different types of land use compared to alpha-diversity. Nutrients and stress from chemical pollution were the variables explaining the dissimilarities between bacterial communities in small, forested, urbanised, and agricultural rivers. Furthermore, an assessment of potential ecological functions associated with the biodegradation of toxic chemicals unveiled a season-specific decline in bacterial degradation potential in all four rivers.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, EnvironmentalRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiodiversityKenyaDNA, EnvironmentalWater Pollutants, ChemicalantimicrobialeDNAland usemicrobial ecotoxicologymicropollutantnutrients

Identifiers

PMID41100179
PMCPMC12598650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.