Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100122›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2025

Radiotherapy With a 12-Gene Expression Assay for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Seema A Khan, Justin Romanoff, Constantine Gatsonis, Habib Rahbar, Ruth Carlos, Sunil Badve, Jean Wright, Ralph L Corsetti, Constance D Lehman, Derrick W Spell and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02352883 (Prospective Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02352883 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Multiparameter Gene Expression Assay in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupRan2015 to 2027Enrolled368ConditionsDuctal Breast Carcinoma In SituArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Therapeutic Conventional Surgery, Therapeutic Surgical Procedure, Radiation Therapy, Endocrine Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Seema A KhanNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Justin RomanoffEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Constantine GatsonisEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Habib RahbarUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Ruth CarlosUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Sunil BadveEmory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jean WrightUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ralph L CorsettiTulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Constance D LehmanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Derrick W SpellGulf-South-NCI Community Oncology Research Program, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Linda K HanIndiana University, Indianapolis.
John R BumberryMercy Hospital, Springfield, Missouri.
Ilana GareenEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Bradley S SnyderEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lynne I WagnerUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Kathy D MillerIndiana University, Indianapolis.
Christopher ComstockMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joseph A SparanoMount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires personalized treatment given its variable natural history. This study reports the first prospective oncologic outcomes of radiotherapy decisions as guided by 12-gene molecular assay, the DCIS score (DS). Objective: To assess surgical outcomes following preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with DCIS and estimate 5-year and 10-year ipsilateral breast event (IBE) rates in participants given DS-based postoperative radiotherapy recommendations after local excision (WLE). Design, Setting, and Participants: Women with screen-detected DCIS who were eligible for WLE were enrolled to a single-arm, multicenter trial conducted at 75 institutions within the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (March 2015 to April 2016) and received a preoperative breast MRI-guided surgical treatment. Those who underwent successful WLE were advised to omit radiotherapy for low DS (<39) and receive radiotherapy for intermediate/high DS (≥39). Those achieving WLE as final treatment and successful DS assay (n = 171) were included in a prespecified analysis. Participants were followed up every 6 months for DCIS or invasive IBE, and 5-year IBE rates were analyzed from July to November 2023. Intervention: DS-based postoperative radiotherapy recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Five-year IBE rates, with 95% CIs. Results: Among the 339 participants, the mean (SD) age was 59.1 (10.1) years. A total of 171 women (50.4%) received WLE for pure DCIS with free surgical margins and had DS data available. A total of 159 (93.0%) adhered to DS-based radiotherapy recommendations; 7 of 82 patients (8.5%) with a low DS underwent radiotherapy, and 5 of 89 patients (5.6%) with an intermediate/high DS declined radiotherapy. Over median (range) follow-up of 5 (0.5-5.0) years, 8 of 171 women experienced IBEs (4.8%; 95% CI, 2.4%-9.4%). IBE rates were similar for participants with a low DS(5.1%; 95% CI, 1.9%-12.9%) and participants with an intermediate/high DS (4.5%; 95% CI, 1.7%-11.7%). Among the 159 women who had adhered to DS-based radiotherapy recommendations, IBE rates were similar for participants with a low DS (5.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.1%) and intermediate/high DS (4.8%; 95% CI, 1.8%-12.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this prespecified analysis of a clinical trial suggest that DS-guided radiotherapy post-WLE for DCIS shows markedly lower 5-year IBE rates (approximately 5%) for intermediate/high DS than previously reported data following WLE alone. Despite a limited sample size, these data potentially provide support for radiotherapy use in patients with intermediate/high DS, and omission when DS is low, although confirmatory studies are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02352883.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingAdultAgedFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41100122
PMCPMC12532027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.