Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100113›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2025

Active Monitoring, Surgery, and Radiotherapy for Cribriform-Positive and Cribriform-Negative Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nikita Sushentsev, Anne Y Warren, Richard Colling, Clare Verrill, Ekaterina Pazukhina, Oleg Blyuss, Tyler M Seibert, Tristan Barrett, Ian G Mills, Richard J Bryant and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02044172 (The ProtecT Trial - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatments for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02044172 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The ProtecT Trial - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatments for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2001 to 2027Enrolled82,849ConditionsProstate CancerArmsRadical prostatectomy, Conformal radiation therapy, Active monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Germline polygenic score for prostate cancer aggressiveness.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nikita SushentsevDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anne Y WarrenDepartment of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard CollingNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Clare VerrillNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ekaterina PazukhinaWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Oleg BlyussWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Tyler M SeibertDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Tristan BarrettDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ian G MillsNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard J BryantNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jenny L DonovanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
David E NealNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cribriform prostate cancer is associated with poor outcomes; however, its optimal treatment strategy remains unclear in the absence of randomized data. Objective: To retrospectively analyze the results of the PROTECT randomized clinical trial to establish the association between cribriform-positive and cribriform-negative prostate cancer and 15-year risk of metastasis in patients who underwent active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between 1999 and 2009, the PROTECT phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled 1643 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this secondary analysis of the PROTECT trial, a centralized histopathologic review was conducted on available diagnostic biopsy slides to classify patients as cribriform-positive if they had invasive cribriform carcinoma and/or intraductal carcinoma. Data were collected from January 25, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and were analyzed from October 14, 2024, to January 30, 2025. Exposures: Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and cribriform status. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was progression to metastatic disease (bony, visceral, or lymph node metastases on imaging or PSA >100 ng/mL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for randomization variables, were incorporated to assess 15-year metastasis risk. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using the Gray test. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results: Among 712 men (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [5.0] years) whose biopsies were retrospectively reviewed, 93 (13.1%) had cribriform-positive disease and 42 (5.9%) developed metastasis. In the intention-to-treat cohort, cribriform-positive disease significantly increased the risk of metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 3.61 [95% CI, 1.60-8.11]; P = .003). Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant ADT significantly reduced metastasis risk (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.16-0.78]; P = .04) (15-year cumulative incidence in patients with cribriform-positive disease, 8%), while surgery delayed metastasis but did not significantly improve long-term outcomes compared with active monitoring (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.25-1.08]; P = .09) (15-year cumulative incidence in patients with cribriform-positive disease, 26% for surgery and 25% for active monitoring). Among patients with cribriform-negative disease, incidence of metastasis was low and did not differ by treatment. Similar per-protocol results were noted. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this secondary analysis of the PROTECT randomized clinical trial suggest that cribriform morphology was a strong, independent predictor of 15-year metastasis among patients with prostate cancer and that radiotherapy with neoadjuvant ADT was associated with a reduced long-term risk of metastasis. Conversely, outcomes were favorable for most patients with cribriform-negative disease, supporting their eligibility for active surveillance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02044172.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAgedAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41100113
PMCPMC12532030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.