Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100112›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025

Pickleball-Related Ocular Injuries Among Patients Presenting to Emergency Departments.

Corey R Lacher, Irene Koc, Jonathan C Tsui

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corey R LacherDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark.
Irene KocRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Jonathan C TsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Pickleball has experienced a surge in participation over the past decade, yet the epidemiology of pickleball-related ocular injuries remains unexplored. Objective: To assess the incidence of and examine demographic factors associated with pickleball-related ocular injuries over the past 20 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database published by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, which is based on a nationally representative probability sample of hospitals in the US and its territories. A population-based sample of cases was obtained by selecting patients who presented to NEISS-affiliated emergency departments with pickleball-related ocular injuries from 2005 to 2024. This resulted in a weighted estimate of ocular injuries nationally. Data were analyzed from October 6, 2024 to July 9, 2025. Exposure: Participation in pickleball. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the unweighted number and weighted number (percentage) of pickleball-related ocular injuries. Demographic information including age, sex, treatment year, and laterality of the injury were collected. The mechanisms of eye injuries and types of eye injuries were also assessed. Results: Between 2005 and 2024, there were an estimated 3112 (unweighted n = 73) pickleball-related ocular injuries with an estimated 1262 (unweighted n = 33) ocular injuries occurring in 2024 alone. Based on a survey-weighted linear regression, the estimated incidence of pickleball-related eye injuries increased by 405 cases (95% CI, 288-522 cases; P = .004) annually from 2021 to 2024. There were more pickleball-related ocular injuries among patients aged 50 years or older than among patients younger than 50 years (difference, 39%; 95% CI, 6%-65%; P = .03). Severe eye injuries included retinal detachment, orbital fracture, globe trauma, and hyphema. Mechanisms of injury included direct hit by a pickleball, direct hit by a paddle, and falls. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that pickleball-related eye injuries have increased at an alarming rate over the past 4 years as the sport continues to grow in popularity. Eye protection is not currently mandated for casual or professional play. Establishing standardized guidelines for eye protection is recommended to reduce the risk of ocular injuries among players.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesEmergency Service, HospitalEye InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41100112
PMCPMC12532024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.