ArticleJAMA network open2025
Naloxone Use, 911 Calls, and Emergency Visits After Nonfatal Overdose.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonfatal Drug Overdose in a National Sample of Adolescents by Intent and Substance, Medicaid 2016-2020.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Proportion of fentanyl reports in illicit drug seizures and nonfatal overdose emergency department visits in the United States, 2021-2024.The International journal on drug policy · 2026Article
- Developing Longitudinal Post-Overdose Care: A Call to Action.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026Article
- Community supervision during Oregon's partial decriminalization Measure 110: Criminal legal system involvement, overdose, and naloxone access.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Understanding the role of overdose witnesses: responses and characteristics of people who inject drugs in Oakland and San Francisco.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: People may not call 911 or visit the emergency department (ED) after a nonfatal overdose (NFOD), particularly when a layperson has already administered naloxone. Understanding service-engagement patterns can improve postoverdose care. Objective: To examine service use following an NFOD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of a telephone survey included adults who used cocaine, opioids, or methamphetamines in the prior 12 months. Respondents were recruited from harm-reduction, treatment, and social services organizations in New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, and New Mexico from January 2023 to August 2024. Exposure: Experience with an NFOD in the prior 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were use of naloxone, calls to 911, and ED visits following an NFOD and self-reported reasons for not calling 911. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated to examine factors associated with each outcome and categorized free-response reasons if not engaging in care. Results: Among the 2097 participants (median [IQR] age, 42 years [34-52 years]; 1165 males [55.6%]), 538 (25.7%) had experienced at least 1 NFOD in the prior year. During the most recent NFOD, use of naloxone was reported by 430 of 524 survivors (82.1%), calls to 911 were reported by 328 of 535 survivors (61.3%), and visits to the ED were reported by 253 of 538 survivors (47.0%). In multivariable regressions of survivors of overdose, 911 was more likely to have been called at the most recent overdose event by people who resided in New Jersey (vs Wisconsin) (AOR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.40-7.47]; P = .01), by non-Hispanic Black people (compared with non-Hispanic White people) (AOR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.08-2.97]; P = .02), and by people who used drugs a few times a month at the time of the interview (vs no drug use) (AOR, 3.83 [95% CI, 1.23-12.00]; P = .02). The most commonly reported reasons for not calling 911 were that the person regained consciousness without naloxone (n = 61 [28.6%]) or that a bystander administered naloxone (n = 57 [26.8%]). Among those with a 911 call, visits to the ED were more common among Black individuals (AOR, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.11-7.54]; P = .03). Most people (n = 150 [61.5%]) received take-home naloxone in the hospital, and approximately one-fifth or fewer reported receiving buprenorphine (n = 57 [21.9%]) or methadone (n = 42 [16.2%]) before discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of survivors of drug overdose, fewer than half of recent overdose events did not culminate in a visit to the ED. These results suggest that policies to improve postoverdose outcomes must simultaneously focus on people who engage with emergency medical services and on those who do not seek formal medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.