ArticleHealth & justice2025
Implementing real-time assessments of substance use cravings, triggers, and mood: a feasibility study with justice-involved populations.
Article in Health & justice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From monitoring to intervention: a closed-loop digital health framework for gaming disorder.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Daily Progress System (DPS) is a daily mobile health monitoring tool that allows clients with opioid use disorder to track substance use, recovery-related symptoms, and recovery support activities (e.g., 12-step groups) over a 24-hour period. This pilot study explored the feasibility of equipping the DPS with an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) feature.
methodsThirty participants with justice involvement were recruited from an outpatient addiction treatment clinic in Maryland. Participants completed an integrated 14-day DPS + EMA protocol that assessed cravings, triggers, and mood three times per day (3–7 items; morning, afternoon, evening), and recovery-related symptoms and activities once per day (DPS, 10 items; evening). Financial incentives were provided for each survey completed. Descriptive statistics described sample characteristics and usage metrics (e.g., compliance). Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare differences in non-normal compliance rates based on time of day and survey type.
resultsOverall compliance with the EMA and DPS surveys was excellent (91.9%). No significant differences in compliance were observed based on time of day or survey type. In terms of acceptability, participants reported high overall satisfaction (MEMA = 8.9/10; MDPS = 9.5/10) and reported that the surveys were easy to understand (MEMA = 4.9/5; MDPS = 4.8/5). Qualitative feedback suggested that the EMA surveys helped participants identify patterns and glean additional insights into their mood, cravings, and triggers. Participants provided suggestions for future development, such as incorporating additional opportunities to report cravings and triggers outside of the primary delivery windows.
conclusionThese findings suggest that equipping the DPS with real-time assessments of cravings, triggers, and mood is feasible and acceptable among individuals with justice involvement who are engaged in outpatient treatment. Further research is needed with larger samples and over longer periods of time to evaluate the long-term benefits of this approach and its potential to enhance treatment adherence, patient engagement, and downstream recovery outcomes. However, these findings support the continued development and refinement of the DPS equipped with real-time assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.