Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100011›Full record

ReviewHealth & justice2025

Implementation of harm reduction strategies in criminal-legal systems: a scoping review of the literature.

Kiersten L Johnson, Sheila V Patel, Jessica Cance, Ivette Rodriguez Borja, Mia-Cara Christopher, Jennifer Counts, Monica Desjardins, Sarah M Philbrick, Leo Beletsky, Bradley Ray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health & justice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kiersten L JohnsonRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA. kijohnson@rti.org.
Sheila V PatelRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Jessica CanceRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Ivette Rodriguez BorjaRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Mia-Cara ChristopherRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Jennifer CountsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Monica DesjardinsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Sarah M PhilbrickRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.
Leo BeletskyNortheastern University, Boston, USA.
Bradley RayRTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA.

Funding

RTI HEAL Harm Reduction Network Coordination CenterU24DA057611 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Jessica Duncan Cance · 2024 to 2026
$8.1M
Collaborative Hub for Emerging Adult Recovery Research (CHEARR)R24DA057632 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI Kristyn Zajac · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA057632NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA057611NIH HHS U24DA057632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHarm reduction is a public health approach that emphasizes strategies to reduce the negative consequences of drug use. Rising overdose deaths in the United States have prompted integration of harm reduction strategies within criminal-legal systems (CLS), which have historically emphasized deterrence. However, the scope and nature of these strategies across the CLS remain poorly understood.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, to identify harm reduction strategies targeting illicit drug use that have been implemented within CLS settings in the United States. We searched seven databases for peer-reviewed articles published in the last 10 years. Eligible articles reported on implementation of a harm reduction strategy focused on reaching PWUD in a CLS setting. Using the Sequential Intercept Model as a guiding framework, we mapped strategies to law enforcement, initial detention/court hearings, jails and courts, reentry, and community corrections settings. We used DistillerSR to screen articles and abstract data.

resultsFrom 455 records, 99 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 51 discrete instances of harm reduction strategy implementation. Implementation was most common in custody settings (e.g., jails and courts) and frequently included initiation of medication for opioid use disorder, naloxone distribution, and CLS referral/diversion. Fewer instances of implementation were documented in early stage or community-based settings. CLS staff were directly involved in delivering over 75% of the harm reduction strategies, and one-third included partnerships with non-CLS government agencies. Nearly one-third of the strategies were implemented as part of research studies.

conclusionsHarm reduction strategies have increasingly been integrated into CLS, though unevenly and often with a narrow clinical focus. Expanding harm reduction within CLS will require broader definitions, system-level buy-in, and efforts to align practice with public health evidence.

Indexed as

Criminal-legal systemEvidence-basedHarm reductionIllicit drug useImplementation

Identifiers

PMID41100011
PMCPMC12532404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.