ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Usability and user experience of tablet-based teleneuropsychology platform for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment: the Italian experience.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accelerating digital innovation in clinical neuropsychology: simulation approach to support medical device certification.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of digital health technologies across disciplines, including clinical neuropsychology, where accessible and efficient platforms for cognitive diagnosis and monitoring are needed. However, limited user-friendliness often prevents their use, particularly among the elderly. Few studies have explored usability (Us) and user experience (UX) of teleneuropsychology platforms in real-world clinical settings. This study reports Us and UX data of a certified tablet-based teleneuropsychology platform developed for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection.
methodsExaminer and User interfaces were evaluated respectively by clinical neuropsychologists (n = 15, mean age 29.7 ± 3.8 years) and healthy volunteers (n = 15, mean age 58 ± 8.1 years). Us and UX were assessed using validated questionnaires: System Usability Scale (SUS), Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), and User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Familiarity with technology was measured using the Information Technology Familiarity Questionnaire (ITF). Non-parametric tests compared Us, UX, and ITF scores between groups; correlation analyses explored associations between demographic variables and questionnaire outcomes.
resultsBoth groups showed good-to-excellent Us and UX, with no significant differences between them. Technology familiarity was significantly higher in the Examiner group. Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between ITF scores and demographic variables, with younger and more educated individuals reporting better familiarity.
conclusionsThis study emphasise how intuitive design and engaging interfaces, like those of the tested platform, can mitigate technological barriers in sensitive context and foster acceptance, even among older users with lower digital familiarity. Future work should refine usability metrics, develop standardized teleneuropsychology guidelines, and promote digital literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41100005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.