Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099954›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.

Yi Yao, Tianzhen Hua, Yucong Li, Meiqing Zhang, Wei Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi YaoSenior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Tianzhen HuaSenior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Yucong LiSenior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Meiqing ZhangSenior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Wei LiuSenior Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China. liuwei202506@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.

Indexed as

BurnsFluid TherapyBlood PressureCardiac OutputCentral Venous PressureCritical CareHemodynamic MonitoringHemodynamicsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicShockUltrasonographyBurn shockCritical care ultrasonographyFluid managementFluid responsivenessFluid tolerancePiCCO

Identifiers

PMID41099954
PMCPMC13053450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.