ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.