ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Toward platelet-count-adaptive anticoagulation in cancer thrombocytopenia: a standards-first, equity-aware proposal.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of platelet therapy: risks, innovations, and clinical judgment.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Low-molecular-weight heparins in atrial fibrillation: clinical scenarios, limitations, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment predispose to thromboembolic complications and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia does not protect against thromboembolism, but increases the risk of bleeding. The prognosis in venous thromboembolism (VTE) strictly depends on the efficacy of anticoagulation. The choice of anticoagulation strategy will depend on the severity of thrombocytopenia and its expected duration. Thrombotic risk is also important, determining the risk of death related to pulmonary embolism and the risk of recurrence/progression of VTE. Possible strategies include full anticoagulation and possible platelet transfusions, modification of the anticoagulation dose or interruption of anticoagulation. The review focuses on the possibilities of VTE treatment in the aspect of clinically significant thrombocytopenia with a platelet count below 50 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.