ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
DFT-based evaluation of covalent organic frameworks for adsorption, optoelectronic, clean energy storage, and gas sensor applications.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polarisation Engineering in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Catalysis.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextCovalent Organic Frameworks (COFs), which are frameworks composed of light atoms held together by strong covalent bonds, are generating interest as potential materials for applications such as renewable energy and gas capture. We employed Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, as implemented in the VASP code, to look at both 2D and 3D COFs. We systematically analyzed various properties, including structural stability, phonon dispersion, electronic structures, density of states, adsorption behavior, and mechanical properties. To get better accuracy, we took into account van der Waals interactions and even used hybrid functionals. What we found was that 3D COFs generally exhibit greater mechanical strength and, in most cases, better gas adsorption, which seems to come from their interconnected pore structures. On the other hand, 2D COFs exhibit enhanced π-electron delocalization and direct band gaps of approximately 2.5 eV, which may be helpful in sensors and optoelectronics. Phonon analyses verified the dynamical stability of both structures. Ultimately, these results underscore the importance of dimensionality in tailoring COF properties for energy and electronic applications.
methodFirst-principles simulations were performed using Density Functional Theory (DFT) within the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP). To account for exchange-correlation effects, we employed the Generalised Gradient Approximation (GGA) in the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) formulation, and we also utilised projector-augmented wave (PAW) pseudopotentials. Hybrid functional (HSE06) and DFT-D3 van der Waals corrections were introduced to improve the accuracy of our band gap prediction. The plane-wave cutoffs were set at 500 eV for the calculations, and Monkhorst-Pack k-point meshes were used with a 3 × 3 × 1 (2D) and 2 × 2 × 2 (3D) grid. Evaluated were structural optimisations, band structures, total and projected DOS, adsorption energies, and charge transfer (using Bader analysis). Assessment of bonding features utilised the Electron Localisation Function (ELF) and charge density difference (Δρ) visualisations. The Phonopy package was used to calculate Phonon dispersions and thus confirm the dynamic stability of the COFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41099867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.