ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Comparative quantum chemical analysis of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone: electronic structure, and reactivity indices using DFT.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe biological activity of steroidal compounds such as dexamethasone (DX) and hydrocortisone (HC) is closely linked to subtle variations in their molecular structure and electronic properties. This study provides a comparative quantum chemical analysis of DX and HC to clarify how these differences influence hydrogen bonding strength, reactivity, and their potential interactions with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Optimized geometries, natural bond orbital (NBO) analyses, frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), global reactivity descriptors, and average local ionization energy (ALIE) calculations demonstrate that DX exhibits greater polarity and electrophilic character compared to HC. These differences help explain the stronger receptor binding affinity observed for DX. Indeed, notably, despite the inherent limitations of gas-phase DFT calculations compared to experimental X-ray data, the theoretical results exhibit good agreement with experimental observations, suggesting the reliability of the computational approach in predicting molecular interactions within the GR active site.
methodsAll quantum chemical calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP functional and 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Structural optimization, FMO analysis, global reactivity descriptors, and dipole moment evaluations were carried out in Gaussian 09. NBO analysis was performed with NBO 5.0. Average local ionization energy (ALIE) surfaces were generated using Multiwfn 3.8, and molecular visualizations were produced with GaussView 5.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41099866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.