ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Mendelian randomization suggests a causal relationship between cerebrospinal fluid metabolites and intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) represent the most prevalent form of cerebral vascular disease, characterized by their capacity to induce life-threatening subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH). Prior investigations have highlighted notable changes in both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of individuals harboring unruptured IAs. However, an insufficiency of research exists that specifically delves into the causal link between metabolites found in the cerebral spinal fluid and the presence of IAs. In the current study, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed as a methological approach to elucidate the causal connections between 338 CSF metabolites and IAs. The metabolic data were sourced from a comprehensive genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary dataset, which encompassed 291 participants. Concurrently, the GWAS datasets for IAs were procured from the work of Bakker et al., who compiled information on 7,495 aneurysm cases (including 5,425 ruptured and 2,070 unruptured) and a control group of 71,934 individuals. The estimation of causal effects was predominantly performed using the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method. To achieve a broader perspective on the potential causal relationships between CSF metabolites and IAs, supplementary analyses were conducted utilizing MR-Egger regression, Weighted Median, Simple Mode, and Weighted Mode techniques. Additionally, to bolster the reliability of the findings, robustness checks for heterogeneity and pleiotropy were implemented. The MR analysis yielded a causal association between IAs and 12 recognized metabolites, along with three metabolites of unknown chemical nature. Elevated Sphingomyelin (d18:1/20:0, d16:1/22:0) concentrations, N-acetylglutamate levels, X-23,308, X-23,593, and X-24,452 were found to correlate with an augmented risk of IAs. Conversely, diminished risks of IAs were observed with lower 2-Hydroxyadipate, Citramalate, Glutamine, Glycine, Hippurate, Isocitrate, Isovalerate (i5:0), Octanoylcarnitine (c8), Ornithine, and Stachydrine levels. Reverse MR analysis indicates that there is a bidirectional causal relationship between IAs and 2-Hydroxyadipate. By clarifying the potential influence of CSF metabolites in the pathogenesis of IAs, this study provides new insights for the exploration of biomarkers for IAs, and offers ideas for more effective and targeted intervention in the treatment and prevention of this complex disease. Further exploration of these findings has the potential to yield enhanced management strategies and improved clinical outcomes for patients with IAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41099863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.