ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Cytogenetic risk-associated outcomes of antithymocyte globulin use in HLA-matched sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) reduces chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), but concerns remain regarding relapse risk, particularly across cytogenetic risk groups. We retrospectively analyzed 148 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in first remission who underwent matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) across three centers. Patients received transplantation with or without ATG (2.5-5 mg/kg) and were stratified by cytogenetic risk (intermediate, n = 128; adverse, n = 20). Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were applied to adjust for baseline imbalances. After a median follow-up of 91 months, ATG use (n = 96) reduced the incidence of cGvHD (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.72; p = 0.001) and improved cGvHD-free relapse-free survival (cGRFS; HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.93; p = 0.022). No significant differences were observed in overall survival, event-free survival (EFS), relapse, or non-relapse mortality. A significant interaction between ATG and cytogenetic risk (p = 0.025) indicated differential effects by risk profiles. In subgroup analyses, intermediate-risk patients derived consistent benefit, whereas adverse-risk patients (ATG n = 12; non-ATG n = 8) showed higher relapse and inferior EFS. With respect to dose, both 2.5 and 5 mg/kg reduced cGvHD relative to non-ATG; exploratory analyses suggested that 2.5 mg/kg may provide adequate prophylaxis without excess relapse, although statistical power was limited. In conclusion, ATG was associated with reduced cGvHD and improved cGRFS in HSCT for AML, with benefit mainly in intermediate-risk patients. Its use in adverse-risk AML warrants caution, as it may be associated with higher relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.