Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099844›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Sex differences in the response to treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Elisa D Müller, Anke C Fender

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisa D MüllerPractice for Psychological and Behavioural Psychotherapy, Lünen, Germany.
Anke C FenderInstitute for Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. anke.fender@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-6165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) impacts markedly on juvenile development and daily function of young and adult patients. Global prevalence and drug prescription rates are consistently on the rise, particularly in young women. Personal experience in daily psychotherapy practice supports sex differences in how the disorder manifests and how the patients respond to treatment. We review sex differences in therapeutic and adverse responses to the cornerstone ADHD pharmacotherapies methylphenodate and amphetamines, under consideration of preclinical mechanistic insights, clinical studies, and relevance for real-life psychotherapy practice. Overall, many gaps in knowledge remain regarding sex differences on all levels of ADHD disease manifestation, diagnosis, and therapy, and the underlying mechanistic basis. Certain treatment strategies may be more or less appropriate, safe, and effective in specific patients, an aspect which warrants further attention in future guideline reforms.

Indexed as

AmphetaminesAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidateSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeAmphetaminesCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateAmphetaminesAttention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADHD)Central stimulantsMethylphenidatePsychostimulantsSex

Identifiers

PMID41099844
PMCPMC12935713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.