Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099838›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Sex-specific differences in urinary incontinence associated factors in older adults: an analysis of the German health update study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS).

Leila Irik, Alexander Winter, Falk Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leila IrikDepartment of Health Service Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. leila.irik@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1610-2200
Alexander WinterUniversity Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-3861
Falk HoffmannDepartment of Health Service Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-5373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition with significant health and societal implications, particularly among older adults. This study aims to analyze sex-specific differences in associated factors among adults aged 55+.

methodsData from the cross-sectional German Health Update Study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS), conducted April 2019 to September 2020, were analyzed for participants aged 55 + years. Differences in UI prevalence by sex were analyzed along possible associated variables (e.g. BMI, education, depressive symptoms (PHQ-8 Score), chronic diseases (any condition expected to last for at least 6 months, self-reported), and limitations of activities of daily living, ADL). UI prevalence was analyzed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To test for sex differences in associated factors, multivariable logistic regressions were performed.

resultsAmong 12,985 participants, UI prevalence was 14.7% and higher in females (17.8%, 95% CI 16.3-19.4) than males (11.1%, 95% CI 9.8-12.5). Female sex (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.70, p < 0.001), age 85 + years (OR 7.07, 95% CI 4.88-10.24, p < 0.001), poor subjective health (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.50-2.36, p < 0.001), ADL limitations (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.24-2.48, p = 0.002), and depressive symptoms (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.84-3.75, p < 0.001) were associated with UI in the multivariable regression. Sex-specific analysis found BMI ≥ 30 (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.52-2.84, p < 0.001), lower education (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27-2.36, p < 0.001) and chronic diseases (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.86, p = 0.042) associated with UI only in females.

conclusionThe self-reported UI prevalence in the general population is higher among females, but also every 9th male is affected. Due to its prevalence and possible impact on quality of life, attending physicians should have increased awareness of UI among older adults and actively offer treatment options.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSex FactorsEducationPhysical impairmentQuality of lifeRisk factorsSex differencesUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID41099838
PMCPMC12532678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.