ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Virtual screening and experimental validation of small-molecule compounds targeting AR in prostate cancer.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer ranks as the second most prevalent malignancy among men, with its progression predominantly driven by androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Despite the centrality of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in managing advanced prostate cancer, the emergence of resistance culminating in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a formidable challenge. In this study, an integrative strategy for virtual screening was developed using a machine learning-based model implemented with Random Forest, followed by molecular docking. This strategy was employed to screen approximately 1,500,000 compounds, ultimately narrowing them down to 20 candidates. Among these, 8020-1599 and C301-6562 were identified as effective AR inhibitors. In vitro assays demonstrated that these compounds significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer cells, exhibiting efficacy comparable to that of the clinical standard, enzalutamide. In vivo experiments further validated their antitumor activity, demonstrating significant tumor growth inhibition without causing notable toxicity. Mechanistically, 8020-1599 and C301-6562 disrupted AR nuclear translocation and its downstream signaling pathways, leading to a marked reduction in the expression of AR-regulated genes FKBP5 and KLK3. This study highlights a promising approach for developing highly effective and minimally toxic AR inhibitors, although further research is required to assess their long-term safety and potential effects on alternative signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41099751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.