ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Mapping transcription factor binding sites by learning UV damage fingerprints.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering transcriptional networks requires methods to accurately map binding sites of sequence-specific transcription factors (ssTFs) across the genome. Here, we show that ssTF binding induces distinct patterns of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), and that these CPD 'fingerprints' can be exploited by machine learning methods to identify ssTF binding sites (TFBS). As a proof of principle, we analyzed CPD-seq data from yeast cells using the Random Forest algorithm to identify 75 TFBS bound by the Hap2/Hap3/Hap5 ssTF complex, including ∼25 new sites missed by previous chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based experiments. Parallel analysis of the Gcr1 ssTF using a neural network trained on CPD-seq data including only 6 known binding sites identified 63 Gcr1 TFBS across the genome. Our analysis indicates that the newly identified TFBS are associated with many genes that function in expected categories (e.g. mitochondrial respiration or glycolysis), and whose mRNA levels are down-regulated in ssTF mutants. Similar analysis of CPD-capture-sequencing data from human cells identified new sites bound by the homologous Nuclear Factor-Y complex. These findings indicate that distinct cellular patterns of UV damage occurring at different classes of TFBS can be recognized by machine learning methods to map these regulatory elements with improved accuracy and single-nucleotide resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.