ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
A Deep Learning Model Detects Glaucoma Based on an OCT Report, but Where Should the Clinician Look to Identify Glaucomatous Damage?
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Larger Real-World OCT Reference Database Improves Accuracy of Glaucoma Flagging Using Summary Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Outperforms Conventional Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess if the heat maps from a deep learning model (DLM) can guide clinicians to relevant locations on an optical coherence tomography (OCT) glaucoma report. Methods: Grad-CAM class activation ("heat") maps were produced by a DLM, with an OCT glaucoma report as input. The reports were generated for 183 eyes/individuals with optic neuropathy consistent with glaucoma, as indicated by arcuate defects ranging from subtle to advanced. The number of eyes in which a particular element of the report had the hottest region and the region that reached a criterion level were tabulated. A theoretical framework was employed to assess if these locations were clinically relevant. This framework employs two prototypical arcuate patterns of damage, one for each hemiretina. Results: In 86.3% of the 183 eyes, the hottest spot appeared in one of the four thickness or deviation maps that have been used for published OCT grading criteria. These same maps accounted for 81.2% of all the hot spots reaching a criterion level. While the hot spots typically overlapped the predicted prototype regions, they were often misleading. For example, 57% of the 183 eyes had the hottest spot, or one or more hot spots, located largely outside the prototypical regions. Conclusions: Although the DLM heat maps are flagging clinically meaningful elements of the report, in their existing form, they are not optimal for guiding the clinician to relevant locations of damage. Translational Relevance: The DLM can tag eyes with glaucomatous damage, and the prototypical patterns overlaid on the reports might aid the clinician in identifying and understanding this damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.