Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099593›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

A Deep Learning Model Detects Glaucoma Based on an OCT Report, but Where Should the Clinician Look to Identify Glaucomatous Damage?

Donald C Hood, Wai Tak Lau, Arin L Stowman, Tayna Gebhardt, Grace Mao, Sol La Bruna, Ari Leshno, Emmanouil Tsamis, Kaveri Thakoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Donald C HoodBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Wai Tak LauDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Arin L StowmanColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Tayna GebhardtDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Grace MaoDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sol La BrunaUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ari LeshnoSheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Emmanouil TsamisBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kaveri ThakoorBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Development, validation and assessment of an automated, topographic structure-function approach to the detection of glaucoma and its progressionR00EY032182 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Emmanouil Tsamis · 2024 to 2026
$745k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY032182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess if the heat maps from a deep learning model (DLM) can guide clinicians to relevant locations on an optical coherence tomography (OCT) glaucoma report. Methods: Grad-CAM class activation ("heat") maps were produced by a DLM, with an OCT glaucoma report as input. The reports were generated for 183 eyes/individuals with optic neuropathy consistent with glaucoma, as indicated by arcuate defects ranging from subtle to advanced. The number of eyes in which a particular element of the report had the hottest region and the region that reached a criterion level were tabulated. A theoretical framework was employed to assess if these locations were clinically relevant. This framework employs two prototypical arcuate patterns of damage, one for each hemiretina. Results: In 86.3% of the 183 eyes, the hottest spot appeared in one of the four thickness or deviation maps that have been used for published OCT grading criteria. These same maps accounted for 81.2% of all the hot spots reaching a criterion level. While the hot spots typically overlapped the predicted prototype regions, they were often misleading. For example, 57% of the 183 eyes had the hottest spot, or one or more hot spots, located largely outside the prototypical regions. Conclusions: Although the DLM heat maps are flagging clinically meaningful elements of the report, in their existing form, they are not optimal for guiding the clinician to relevant locations of damage. Translational Relevance: The DLM can tag eyes with glaucomatous damage, and the prototypical patterns overlaid on the reports might aid the clinician in identifying and understanding this damage.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaOptic Nerve DiseasesTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41099593
PMCPMC12534887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.