ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Attentional Eye Selection Affects Perception During Binocular Rivalry.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-Tracking in Bipolar Disorder: A Methodology-Focused Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Neither the number of feature dimensions nor their task relevance necessarily affect interocular grouping in binocular rivalry.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: When dissimilar images are presented to the two eyes, perception alternates between them, a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry. This study aimed to investigate how attentional eye selection modulates sensory eye dominance across a range of stimulus sizes during binocular rivalry. Methods: Twelve normally sighted observers (mean age: 34 ± 14 years; six females) viewed dichoptically presented orthogonal gratings with distinct contrast-reversal rates (6 Hz and 7.5 Hz). Binocular rivalry was assessed across five stimulus sizes (1°, 2.5°, 5°, 10°, 15°) under two conditions: without attention and with attention directed to the nonsighting eye, as determined by the hole-in-the-card test. The occurrence of perceptual alterations, the duration of perceptual dominance, and the relative proportion of monocular and mixed percepts were measured. Results: In the absence of directed attention, the sighting eye exhibited greater perceptual dominance, evidenced by higher occurrence rates, longer dominance durations, and larger dominance proportions. When attention was selectively directed to stimuli of the nonsighting eye, perceptual dominance shifted toward the attended nonsighting eye, with the most pronounced effect observed at the 5° stimulus size. The proportion of mixed percepts remained unaffected by such selective attention across all stimulus sizes. Conclusions: Voluntary attentional eye selection can modulate sensory eye dominance during binocular rivalry, with the magnitude of this modulation varying with stimulus size. Translational Relevance: These findings highlight the potential of attentional strategies in modulating sensory eye dominance, offering insight that may inform therapeutic interventions for visual disorders such as amblyopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.