ReviewMutagenesis2026
Aneuploidy in exfoliated buccal cells: mechanisms, methods, and future perspectives.
Review in Mutagenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aneuploidy and polyploidy have a major impact in congenital and acquired diseases, in particular in cancer development. This mini-review highlights the use of exfoliated buccal cells as a non-invasive tool for monitoring aneuploidy. It offers a mechanistic overview and illustrative diagrams addressing five key areas: (i) the causes of aneuploidy; (ii) cell kinetics and aneuploidy induction in epithelial buccal cells; (iii) the methods for the detection of aneuploidy; (iv) the scientific and medical domains applying aneuploidy detection in exfoliated buccal cells; (v) the knowledge gaps and future research perspectives. Although well validated protocols, automated systems and specific probes allowing discrimination between chromosome aberration, aneuploidy and polyploidy in exfoliated buccal cells are available, large-scale cohort human studies remain lacking. These studies are crucial for evaluating aneuploidy in populations exposed to genotoxic agents or at risk for buccal dysplasia. Future validation and predictivity studies should compare fluorescence in situ hybridization and total DNA content methods such as densitometry or flow cytometry, in exposed individuals and control groups with careful control of confounding factors and adherence to standardized reporting guidelines. In addition, assessment of aneuploidy frequencies in parallel in lymphocytes and exfoliated buccal cells in the same populations would allow to compare their predictive value in both tissues. Moreover, mechanistic studies are also needed to better understand the sources of variability in aneuploidy and how buccal cell biology compares to other cell types. In conclusion, due to their ease of collection and non-invasive nature, exfoliated buccal cells represent a promising tool for aneuploidy testing for risk assessment of environmental or occupational exposures and disease prediction and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.