Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099479›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.

Francesca Perin, Liliang Ouyang, Khoon S Lim, Antonella Motta, Devid Maniglio, Lorenzo Moroni, Carlos Mota

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Beyond printing: toward biologically informed biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca PerinMERLN Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229ER, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-4936
Liliang OuyangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4177-8698
Khoon S LimSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2486-196X
Antonella MottaBioTech, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, 38123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-6863
Devid ManiglioBioTech, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, 38123, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-861X
Lorenzo MoroniMERLN Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229ER, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6025
Carlos MotaMERLN Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229ER, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5935-6245

Funding

H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies 964452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprinting has become one of the leading topics in biomedical research in the past decade, as demonstrated by the great surge in publications and proliferation of bioprinting facilities worldwide. Bioprinting has gained widespread popularity because of its potential to replicate complex biological structures, revolutionize in vitro testing, and tissue engineering. However, the clinical translation of bioprinted products remains a challenge. The regulatory approval of tissue-engineered products requires extensive preclinical and clinical trials with different standards worldwide. The regulatory landscape for bioprinted products is examined in the European Union, United States, China, and Australia. The current regulatory status of bioprinting is traced by exploring parallels with existing categories such as 3D printed medical devices, injectable hydrogels, and tissue engineering products. This perspective provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and regulatory landscape of bioprinted constructs, envisioning challenges, and strategies for their future integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

BioprintingAnimalsHumansHydrogelsPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsHydrogelsbiofabricationbioprintingclinical translationregulatorytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41099479
PMCPMC12810673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.