ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2026
Intersectional Bias in Healthcare-The Inequity Borne by the Patients: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare should be neutral and equal, but normative beliefs may impact the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management.
objectivesTo explore how patients with jaw and neck pain perceive pain management and the interaction with healthcare professionals in relation to intersectionality, with a specific focus on gender.
methodsRecruitment was performed at a specialist dentistry clinic in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, reporting jaw and neck pain and understanding the Swedish language. Exclusion criteria were rheumatic disease, temporomandibular joint arthralgia or arthritis. Using purposive sampling, 16 patients (11 women) aged 19-56 were interviewed using individual semi-structured interviews. The analysis was performed using thematic analysis.
resultsThe analysis resulted in the theme: 'Intersectional bias in healthcare - the inequity borne by the patients', with five subthemes that entailed different types of bias related to the participants' personal characteristics and their interaction with healthcare professionals. Health-related stigmata was one subtheme described among participants, resulting in labelling and burden in the encounter. Other subthemes also described bias in relation to biological differences among pain patients and patients not being taken seriously due to, for example, female gender and younger age. Two subthemes also described bias in relation to the healthcare professionals' gender and age.
conclusionNormative beliefs have a negative impact on the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management. Since patient-provider interaction should be neutral and equal, intersectional bias should be acknowledged to prevent health and care inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.