Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41099373›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025

Disease-Modifying Drugs for Alzheimer's Disease: Bending the Curve.

Faheem Arshad, Suvarna Alladi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faheem ArshadDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Suvarna Alladi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia worldwide and the leading cause of disability in the aging population. While several disease-modifying therapies, particularly anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, have recently gained approval, their clinical accessibility remains limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A major prerequisite for initiating these treatments is a biomarker-based diagnosis, typically involving cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis or amyloid/tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, these biomarkers are often costly, invasive, or unavailable in resource-constrained settings, emphasizing the urgent need for affordable, scalable, and validated biomarkers to enable early and accurate diagnosis and intervention. This review critically examined the current landscape of approved disease-modifying drugs for AD, their efficacy, safety profiles, and implementation challenges in LMICs. It also explored emerging therapeutic strategies beyond amyloid- and tau-targeting agents, including plasma exchange, synaptic modulators, and gene-based approaches. Finally, it discussed the future trajectory of AD therapeutics, emphasizing the necessity of strengthening healthcare systems and developing globally inclusive research frameworks to ensure equitable access to disease-modifying treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid imagingbiomarkersdisease-modifying therapies

Identifiers

PMID41099373
PMCPMC12610953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.