Trial reportNeuro-oncology2026
Phase I/II and window-of-opportunity study of pamiparib and metronomic temozolomide for recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant gliomas.
Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Targeted Therapies for Adult Gliomas.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical studies demonstrate activity of poly(adenosine 5'-diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas. We investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the PARP inhibitor pamiparib in conjunction with metronomic low-dose temozolomide in patients with recurrent IDH mutant (IDHmt) gliomas in a multicenter Phase I/II/window of opportunity study.
methodsPatients received pamiparib in conjunction with daily temozolomide. Following Phase I determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD), we enrolled 2 patient cohorts (Arm A, multiple prior chemotherapy regimens; Arm B, single prior regimen) in a 2-stage design. Exploratory cohorts examined grade 4 IDHmt patients and intratumoral pharmacokinetics of pamiparib. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response (ORR) by RANO criteria.
resultsSixty-six subjects were enrolled. We established pamiparib 60 mg twice daily with temozolomide 20 mg daily as the phase II dose. In non-enhancing and enhancing tumor, pamiparib exhibited an unbound tumor/plasma ratio of 0.92 and 0.98, respectively. 0/15 Arm A and 1/24 Arm B patients achieved a centrally confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival for Arm A was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.2-14.8 months), and for Arm B was 9.7 months (95% CI, 5.7-21.7 months). Grade 3+ anemia and neutropenia affected 24% and 33% of patients, respectively. Twenty-two of 66 patients (33.3%) discontinued study treatment for reasons other than tumor progression.
conclusionsPamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors. While some patients achieved prolonged progression-free survival, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial and impacted long-term tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.